
I’ve just learnt from the Literary Saloon that BS Johnson’s The Unfortunates has been re-issued in the US by New Directions. The NY Sun have a flick through:
There is one catch, though: The Unfortunates is a book in a box. It consists of 27 loose sections. One is marked “First,” and one is marked “Last,” but the rest are to be read in any random order. In his introduction, Mr. Coe reports that in its day, The Unfortunates “was accorded at best a sort of grudging respect, tempered with a palpable, barely disguised disdain for its pretensions to originality.” And we should disdain those pretensions. Johnson insisted that his randomly sorted sections were better at “conveying the mind’s randomness” than any other technique. But this novelty provides little in the way of mimesis, it only draws attention to itself.
And yet it proves to be a great deal of fun. I chose a thicker, stapled section, and then a thinner, pasted one. I would read three tiny sections in a spate. When I saw that the section on top described Tony’s funeral, I decided to avoid it, until finally I couldn’t resist it. On the whole, the freedom to dispose of one tiny packet after another made the book itself an effortless read.
For its honest depiction of how young men deal with cancer, The Unfortunates can be widely recommended, even to readers not used to “Nashe, Sterne, and Samuel Beckett.” Johnson’s own dogged seriousness, and his concomitant boyishness, make a fascinating medium for his occasional bursts of pity and shy friendliness. This book deserves a place in the history of memoir, and in anthologies about illness, and, with luck, it will have one, if readers do not judge it by its covers.
Given the nature of The Unfortunates, Scott Esposito wonders if everyone is reading the same book.
“…You’d be reading a physically different book as you technically read the same one, just as the narrator reflects that, “everything we know about someone is perhaps not the same, even radically different from what others, another, may seem or understand about them, him.””
Perhaps this is true - that whatever order you read it in the experience is more or less equal. But then if this is true, I wonder if Jonson didn’t fail at what he attempted. Because the book does seem to be about encountering the same person differently. Or maybe it’s really about how people are more or less the same, even when encountered differently.
See also, Let’s have a BS Johnson Day.


The 

