|
PAGE 2 ANGRY!CUSTARD PIE IN THE SKY (CONTINUED)
Although he loathes the type of postmodern fiction that
disappears up its own ars rhetorica , language is the pièce de
résistance (a rococo pièce montée would be a more apt
description) which Godin dishes out with evident relish. We are talking
language with bite here, the mordant kind that bares its teeth and
just about everything else, pouring forth at full lick like spewed-up
moules frites , when it is not swooning at its own swagger. An acquired
taste, of course, but one well worth acquiring if you have the stomach for a
gargantuan four-course discourse. The spicy anecdotes are sometimes a mere
pre-text : all the fun of the fare resides in their cocasse
recountal. Around these veracious, elated, voraciously-related vignettes,
Godin erects a Babel of babble, a towering inferno of titillating
tittle-tattle : a pleasure-principle dome. Beyond the picaresque
eripeteia - in the nooks and crannies of the tortuous sentences, the kooky
portmanteau words ("attentarte") and pithy, presumably off-the-cuff,
one-liners - lies the plaisir du texte . The sheer-stocking bliss
of textual harassment. The stoccado, scattato stiletto style. Even the
cantankerous cursing is quaint and recherché ; a devilishly
efficacious cross between an eighteenth-century libertine ("foutre Dieu!")
and Tintin's foul-mouthed sidekick, Captain Haddock ("ventre de boeuf !",
"mille tonerres !", "jambon à cornes !"). If Godin won't eat his words -
every other sentence is a sentence to death - then the reader probably will
: who would refuse to be fed a diet to die for in an age of Prozac prose and
Lit Lite ? There are shades of Rabelais, a pervading sense of
démesure , in this verbal surfeit, as well as in the constant
oscillation between refinement and vulgarity. Gab-gifted Godin's Gallic
garrulity - with its declamatory, tribun-style tournures,
and robust Third-Republic, école communale flavour - often
degenerates into a slang slanging match with the world as it is and should n
ot be. His cyclothymic style swells up into a bomb blast of bombast in the
mock-heroic mode, then collapses from within into an understated, deadpan
shorthand like a soufflé gone awry. There is always a rapid
detumescent descent from the giddy heights of Godin's furor loquendi
: after each yackety-yack attack, the scintillating syntax grinds to a
halt, not with a bang but a whimper. This self-deflating prose, which pricks
its own champagne bubble of pomposity every now and then, gives the
hilarious impression of an orgy ending in a bout of digestive-biscuit
nibbling. Bref , Crème et châtiment is a feisty feast of
lingual felicity, which is not to say that it is short on substance.
Ultimately, the author remains something of an enigma :
a protean master of disguise, a Machiavellian maverick, an avant-garde
film director, a pathological liar (in his incapacity as a critic), a
righter of wrongs and a writer of sorts. A fruitcake, perhaps, but Crème
et châtiment shows us that there is a recipe in his madness.
His law studies came to a sticky end when he poured a
pot of glue over a right-wing professor who had worked for the Portuguese
dictator Salazar. That was just before getting caught up in the student
uprising of 1968 which was to change the course of his life. In 1995, he
told The Observer that he was "never cured of the fever of May
1968." As Walter Pater once put it : "To burn always with this hard, gem-like
flame, to maintain this ecstasy, is success in life." |